Passes & Canyons Blog

Getting ready to head out on a day of riding.

When I got my first bike, my 1980 Honda CB750 Custom, my friend John, who had ridden motorcycles off and on his whole life, gave me a bit of advice: Don’t use the front brake or you’ll go flying over the handlebars.

I was a novice so I believed him but after awhile I learned better. In case anyone out there still believes this you should know that more than half of your braking ability comes from your front brake. Not to use it is absurd. If you shouldn’t use it, why do they put one on the bike?

Sure, you have to use it properly. You don’t want to use it hard on loose gravel because that’s a sure way to go down. I learned that on my own. And then I relearned it. On some bikes you have to use that front brake very judiciously. I was test riding a KTM 1190 Adventure some years ago and that thing had such a terrific front brake that if you were going fast and hit it hard you very well could go over the handlebars. The KTM guys warned us before we went out about not hitting that brake too hard.

But do use the front brake; that’s what it’s there for.

Another practice I had to unlearn was the way I was leaning my bike on curves. Nowadays, for fun, I lean way off the bike even on easy curves just to see how upright I can keep the bike through the curve. But early on, I found it very comfortable to lean the bike way over while I continued sitting pretty much upright. A totally bad idea.

Somewhere along the way I learned about traction and how the more the bike is leaned, the more available traction is used. And the more it is used, the less you have left in case you need to lean even further.

So what do you do? You lean your body to the inside of the curve, out away from the bike, to counterbalance so the bike can be kept as upright as possible. When those racers lean so far out that their knees are gliding along the track surface on their knee pucks it’s pretty clear that their bikes are leaned over really far, too. But think what would happen if they didn’t have the benefit of their counterbalancing lean. Can you say low-side?

There must be other bad practices that I have learned to overcome, although those are the two that come readily to mind. Anyone out there have any of their own to offer?

Biker Quote for Today

Learn to do counter-intuitive things that may some day save your butt.

Now this would be an easy bike to pass your test on.

Big, 800-pound bagger motorcycles are very popular, at least in the U.S., but there’s one place you’ll never see them: at the Department of Motor Vehicles on the license testing range.

When you’re getting your motorcycle accreditation you have to pass the written test and also pass a driving test, just like with a car. The driving portion for a bike takes place out in the parking lot, where they set up cones and have you ride through the course demonstrating your competence. On a scooter, or a small bike, such as a 250cc Honda Rebel, it’s easy. For a beginning rider to maneuver their full-size bike around the course, the likelihood of success is minute.

I didn’t know this when I bought my first bike. But I learned.

I had ridden motorcycles whenever I had the opportunity for many years, but it was only once I bought my first bike, a 1980 Honda CB750 Custom, that I got licensed. My friends told me then that it would be good to get a small bike to take the test but I didn’t have any idea where to get that small bike so off I went on my 750.

Now, a 750cc bike is only considered a mid-size bike anymore, though it was a big bike in 1980, and it still weighs about 500 pounds. I suspect the licensing examiner was surprised to see what I rode in on but no matter, let’s go do the test.

The first part of the course demonstrates handling control. You have to weave around cones in a slalom pattern at slow speed. Then there was a right turn, and another right turn, which set you up to come into a much tighter box where you have to do a 180-degree turn.

I did not make it through all the cones and when I came around for the 180 I had not understood the directions properly. I thought the examiner told me to stay outside the lines, when in fact I was supposed to stay inside them. I was successful in staying outside. You then start out from a spot where you accelerate forward and then brake and swerve sharply as if you were avoiding an obstacle. That part was easy.

Of course I failed the test. And I was very surprised when she told me I utterly failed to make the U-turn within the lines. Ooooh. Within! I get it now.

Second Try
Now that I knew what the test consisted of I practiced. I showed up again a few days later, not at all confident I would succeed, but willing to take a shot at it. With no training I instinctively figured out that to weave through the cones I had to drag the rear brake, where you keep the engine revved for stability while working the rear brake to move forward at about walking speed. To my relief, I got through the cones just fine.

Heading into the U-turn I now knew I needed to stay inside the lines and, dragging the rear brake again, I successfully executed the turn. Coming out of it, however, the lean was too great and the bike laid over on its side. It didn’t actually go all the way down; it ended up resting half-way up on the foot peg. I looked at the examiner and she said she couldn’t help me but if I got the bike back up I could keep going with the test.

I raised the bike and continued and everything else went fine. She passed me. Yahoo!

I have since learned that one of the major benefits of taking a Motorcycle Safety Foundation riding course is that you learn on small bikes and at the end of the course you do the riding portion of the test. If you pass, all you have to do to get your license is go to Motor Vehicle, pass the written portion, and pay your fee. Of course you also get some training in the process, which is a very good thing.

Had I known all this that’s probably what I would have done. I didn’t, though, so now I take pride in being able to say I passed the test on my real, full-sized highway bike. And I love the looks of amazement I get when I say that.

Biker Quote for Today

We know you’re a poser if you put your pony-tail back in the drawer after you get home.

Back in 2013 there was opposition to continuing the MOST program. Most supporters from those days now wish they had lost that battle.

Bureaucracies never die, you just wish they would. Take Colorado’s MOST program–please!

The Motorcycle Operator Safety Training (MOST) program is up for sunset review this year, as House Bill 20-1285, and although it is no longer doing anything close to what it was intended to do, it appears destined to continue to exist. HB20-1285 will be heard in the House Business Affairs & Labor Committee on March 3 if you want to go register your preferences.

It started out as a good thing. Colorado motorcyclists supported the creation of MOST, willingly agreeing to pay an extra $4 every time we renew our drivers licenses and an extra $2 for every motorcycle license plate renewal in order to fund the program. In return, money raised was used primarily to lower the cost for students taking motorcycle rider training courses. The legislation limited program administrators to using only up to 15% of the funds to cover the cost of administration.

Today the program brings in about $800,000 per year but not one penny goes to reducing the cost of training. And while the administrators say they keep their cost to under 15%, a good deal more than that is used to fund “contract administration,” which is to say, to pay for an outside vendor to run the program. Isn’t that what the state agency was supposed to do with the 15%? And just what exactly are they doing with the rest of the money? Putting up road signs warning drivers to watch out for motorcycles? That doesn’t seem a particularly good return on the investment of $800,000. Per year.

You might think there would now be a concerted effort to get rid of MOST but you would be wrong. I raised this question at my ABATE D-17 meeting last week and it seems the matter comes down to one consideration. All organizations and companies in Colorado that offer motorcycle rider training, if they operate under the MOST umbrella, can sign off a student on the riding portion of their motorcycle riders license presuming they pass the course successfully. Then all they need to do is take the written test and boom, they’re done.

The concern is that if MOST went away, so would this ability to certify the riders, and the impetus to take training would diminish. That would mean more untrained–and possibly unlicensed–riders out there and a lot less income for ABATE, T3RG, and other training organizations.

A number of years ago the MOST program was up for review and was facing harsh criticism. The Colorado Confederation of Clubs was actively campaigning to abolish it. ABATE of Colorado fought to keep it.

Now, from what I gather, everyone hates MOST but we have to keep it or else.

How about a different approach? How about we get rid of MOST but pass a bill allowing rider training vendors to certify trainees as long as they meet certain standards? We could cut the amount we riders contribute to maybe $1 on our plate renewals and that should completely cover the modest expense to monitor the training vendors.

Of course, passing the legislation is the sticker. That requires finding sympathetic legislators, crafting a bill, and building a constituency to get it passed. That’s not easy. It’s just so much easier to renew the program for another five years and move on to the next bill. Even if the program is not doing what it was created to do. This is why bureaucracies never die.

Biker Quote for Today

You know you’re a biker if you pile boxes and laundry on your car, but your bike must have 6 feet or clearance in the garage.

Just because you buy a sportbike doesn’t make you Valentino Rossi, or even John Kuo.

If you ride a motorcycle you need accreditation on your driver’s license, right? Oh dude, that’s so last century!

Or at least that is apparently how some young hotshots on sportbikes see it.

This was an interesting discussion we had at the ABATE District 17 meeting last month. ABATE of Colorado is one of a number of outfits offering rider training courses, and the best way to get your initial accreditation is to take a Beginning Rider Course (BRC). At the end, presuming you pass the riding part of the test, all you then need to do is go to Motor Vehicle and take the written test. Boom, you’re licensed.

What one D-17 member brought up, however, is that he is a member of a few Facebook motorcycle groups, and among those who are active in that group, the general opinion is that hey, we don’t need no stinkin’ license. If a member posts that he/she got busted for riding without a license the common response is, “You should have outrun the cops!” Truth is, if you are a skilled rider of a high-powered sportbike, you probably can outrun the cops pretty easily. Unlike you, they are not going to risk the public safety trying to chase you down.

But sometimes they get nailed. And often that means, in order to get their bike back–which is often impounded–they have to get licensed. And as I said, there’s no better way to get licensed than taking a BRC. So rider coaches are accustomed to having students in their classes moaning that they have to take this course. They don’t want to, but they want their bike back.

I don’t know about you, but I consider this attitude a problem. For one thing, people die because of it. Just because you buy a sportbike and learn to ride it reasonably well does not make you Valentino Rossi. Unfortunately, that’s the last lesson some people learn just before they shuffle off this mortal coil.

So, ABATE offers rider training, and the discussion was on the question, how do we persuade more people to get training? Obviously, the more students, the more ABATE makes in fees, but the fees were not the focus of the conversation. We all just really believe people should get trained. It makes you a better rider. But how do you reach people?

One obvious thought is to try to engage them on the Facebook groups, but doesn’t seem particularly promising. Nobody responds well to a public scolding. Meanwhile cultivating relationships and gradually trying to point people in a certain direction is very time-consuming, with no guarantees even then.

It’s hard. And no, we didn’t come up with any silver bullets. If you’ve got one, or even just a copper .BB, fire it my way. In the meantime, if you know anyone riding without a license, do them a favor and try to talk some sense to them. The life you save may be theirs.

Biker Quote for Today

I learned one thing from jumping motorcycles that was of great value on the golf course, the putting green especially: Whatever you do, don’t come up short. — Evel Knievel

The CSP’s first stakeholder engagement meeting.

The Colorado State Patrol (CSP) held its first stakeholder engagement meeting Friday, with about 20 people present, as it takes over control of the Colorado Motorcycle Operator Safety Training program (MOST) from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). Essentially the meeting presented an opportunity for the organizations that provide rider training to propose tweaks to the program to help bring regulatory concepts into line with on-the-ground reality.

The first–and most extensive–discussion was on allowing larger bikes to be used in the Beginning Rider Course (BRC). Current limitations say no more than 350cc but it was argued that the limit should be raised to 500cc. The gist of the argument was that if most riders are going to actually get out on the road on larger bikes, why shouldn’t they be trained on the bikes they’re actually going to ride? It was agreed that the training vendors need to continue to have smaller training bikes on hand for those trainees who need them, but for those capable of handling larger bikes, why not make that an option?

As I understand it, there is also the consideration that the Harley-Davidson training programs all use larger bikes and thus are currently excluded from participation with MOST due to the 350cc limitation.

Also raised was the requirement that Rider Coaches be 21 years of age. The point made was that while there may not be a lot of 18-year-olds who you would want to trust as a Rider Coach, in the few cases where you would, why not allow it? This is especially important because there is currently a shortage of Rider Coaches in the Colorado and opening it up a little more could help. It was also suggested that the requirement that a Rider Coach training in Colorado must hold a Colorado driver’s license be amended.

This opened up the issue that some of the specifics vendors deal with are written in law while others are only regulatory in nature. CSP personnel at the meeting made it clear they want to get a solid year under their belts running MOST before they start talking about proposing legislative changes. The consensus at the meeting was that that was reasonable but that these sorts of issues ought to be presented as a package when the time comes.

Another suggestion was to try to have the law rewritten so as to reference the curriculum in use. That way, it would not be necessary to change the law every time the curriculum changes. Apparently, however, there are some limitations on citing outside sources “by reference” because there is the possibility that those sources might call for something contrary to state law. There do appear to be workarounds in this regard, though.

That brings us to the point in the meeting where Bruce Downs, state coordinator for ABATE of Colorado, took the floor to present a series of tweaks and revisions that his organization (of which I am a member) would like to see made. I’ll go over all that in my next post.

Biker Quote for Today

You’re a biker wannabe if all your leathers match.

Bob (left) and Will, the other students in my ERC.

I took the Experienced Rider Course (ERC) once before. In fact, it was the first rider training course I ever took. Since then I’ve also taken the Beginning Rider Course twice, a dirtbike riding course, and I did the Rider Coach Training course, although I never worked as a Rider Coach. Here’s a tip: it never hurts to take a riding course–you always learn something new and improve existing skills.

The primary focus of this ERC I did on Friday was tight maneuvering. That wasn’t all, of course. The overall point is to learn to be a better rider everywhere. But if you can handle a big bike in tight quarters, handling that same bike in the wide open spaces is just that much easier. And sometimes that extra bit of control can make all the difference.

So I’ll get right to it. The number one thing I got out of this course was understanding what it takes to make a big bike make a really tight turn. Maybe you’ve seen these riders doing circles on big baggers that you couldn’t even dream of doing on a little 250. How the heck do they do that?

Don’t think I’m going to claim that I can do that now. But I am a little closer.

Bob, the instructor, talked about counter-weighting. If you need to lean the bike way over you also need to move your body the other direction to balance that out. Counter-weighting. To do this you put your weight on the outside peg and lean way back.

But the thing that got me was his instruction to keep your inside arm straight. Think about that. You’re turning left, you’ve got that left grip tucked in close to your body, and yet you need to keep your arm straight. If that’s not going to keep your weight off to the other side nothing will.

Fact is, I wasn’t sure it was even possible. I mean, OK, let’s say you’re riding a sport bike with little clip-ons. That seems doable. But my CB750 has a steer-horn handlebar that is 31 inches from tip to tip, and sitting upright in the saddle with the wheel turned as far as it can go the grip is about five inches from my stomach. I’m supposed to keep that arm straight?!

Guess what? It can be done. I couldn’t go it right off, but we went around again and again and I kept pushing myself and after awhile it happened. I’ve never made tighter turns with that bike in my life. I admit that the thought of putting weight on my outside peg never crossed my mind, though I suspect that happened naturally.

Most of the rest of the course was a refresh. We practiced techniques I know but maybe was a little rusty with. But then, I’ve taken this course before, as well as others. If you haven’t ever taken a riding course there’s probably a ton of stuff you’ve never learned. I don’t care if you’ve been riding 40 years I bet you’d learn something new. And you’ll be a better rider.

Is there any reason in the world that that would not be a good thing?

Biker Quote for Today

I hate being sexy but I’m a biker, so I can’t help it.